[Sidebar: While starting with a sidebar is unusual to
say the least, I felt it necessary because this post has gotten itself
completely out of hand in terms of length.
But then when I thought about it attempting to synthesis history and
future history into a single post should be long. Also forgive me for injecting myself into
many of the sidebars.]
It’s weird when you think about it, the historians,
archeologists, and other social scientists discuss the ages of culture as the
early stone age, the late stone age, the copper age, the bronze age, the iron
age, and so on, as the way to name the cultures of humans.
I think there is a better way to understand the ages of
humanity. It is through humanity’s creation and dissemination of information
and knowledge. All the current ages of
humanity are really based on these four transformations of data, information,
and knowledge.
Knowledge Generation before Speech
Prior to the development of speech there were two ways that
life created “information and knowledge”.
The first started with the start of life itself on earth. It was the combination of changes in the DNA
chains and natural selection by the environment. [Sidebar: This is
still the foundation on which all other forms of knowledge creation is built;
that is, except for a relatively small number of differences, human DNA and
tree DNA is the same.] One form
of this knowledge creation and communications is instinctual behaviors. Additionally, this forms the basis for the
concept of Environmental Determinism.
The second way “information and knowledge” was created was
through the evolution of “monkey-see-monkey-do”; that is, through “open
instincts”. An open instinct is one that
allows the life-form, generally, animals to observe its surroundings, orient
the observations (food, a place to hide, a threat), decide on an action,
and act. [Sidebar: Oh shoot, there goes
Boyd’s OODA loop again.] No
longer does DNA only decide. To make the
decision the life-form must learn to observe, choosing which input is data and
which is noise, and must create a mental model in order to orient the observed
data. Both of these require the ability
and time to learn. This learn-by-doing
forms the basis for the concept of “Possiblism”.
The Age of Speech (~350,000 to 80,000 BC)
As noted, the learn-by-doing (monkey-see-monkey-do) process
requires both the ability and time to learn.
According to studies of DNA and archeology, the average man would live
about 20 years. [Sidebar: note that even today a boy becomes a man at age 13 in
the Jewish religion. This means that
thousands of years ago, the man would have 7 years to procreate before
dying. Today, that 13 year old kid is
not even in high school.] So there is a
time when the young need adult protection to learn. This may be a few months as in the case of
deer, or a couple of years.
The problem with learn-by-doing is that it requires both the
ability to learn and the time to learn.
Because DNA evolution continues with each biological experiment—each
child—there will be significant variations in the ability to learn. So, sometimes knowledge would be lost by the
inability of a child to learn-by-doing.
Other times, the parent/coach could die unexpectedly early, so that
there was insufficient time for knowledge transfer. Either way, information and knowledge was
lost.
At some point between approximately 350,000 BC and 80,000
BC, possibly in several steps a new hopeful dragon (to use Carl Sagan’s term)
was born. This hopeful dragon had some ability to articulate and an open
instinct to most probably create a noun (the name of a thing) and/or a verb
(the name of an action). This gave birth
to language. And language allowed for
learning-by-listening, which turned out to be a competitive advantage for the groups
and tribes that had it when compared with those that didn’t.
This is Learning-by-listening resolves the problem of
loosing knowledge gained by previous generations. As language evolved it enabled humans to
communicate increasingly abstract concepts to others. Initially, (for 100,000 years or so) much of
this knowledge was communicated by statement of observations and commands, some
of it evolved (likely at a much later date) into stories, odes, epic tales,
sagas, and myths. These tales
encapsulated the knowledge of prior generations; the tribal or cultural memory.
Toward the end of the period (~80,000 BC) when speech and
language were born Homo sapiens started migrating from Africa. Some researcher believe this was due to the
competitive advantage of speech and language, that is, better methods of
knowledge accretion and communication when compared with other animals.
The Age of Speech allowed for the accumulation of data,
information, and knowledge. Much of this
was passed along in the form of tails, odes, myths, and so on. At the same time practical skills like
hunting and gathering were learned more effectively when verbal instructions
and especially critics could be given.
Students learned much faster and at a much higher level. The result was a differential in knowledge
among the many, many small family groups and tribes.
After many millennia of inter-tribal wars and with some
inter-tribal trading enough data, information, and knowledge was created to
begin the long trek to civilization. [Sidebar: During
the “hunter gatherer stage of human “civilization” there were no “Noble
Savages”, just savages. According to DNA
evidence and studies of tribes in New Guinea, the average male was killed when
approximately 20 years old.]
During the time from the Paleolithic through the Neolithic ages, knowledge accumulated very slowly. Archeologists have found the innovations
diffused through the human population over hundreds of years. Many archeologists want to attribute this to
trading, but evidence suggests that much of the time violence was involved.
The Age of Writing (~3000 BC)
Speech and language enabling and supporting
Learning-by-doing and learning-by-listening provided the basis for humans’
knowledge development for the next 70,000+ years. It was not until human
organizations grew beyond a few hundred individuals with a geographic territory
beyond what a person could walk in a day that humans had a need for data,
information, and knowledge transfer/communications that went beyond speech.
At about the time the first large kingdoms
were formed, apparently the traders of the era found a need to track their
trading. And traders and trading was the
main vehicle for communicating data, information, and knowledge during this
entire period. [Sidebar:
At least this is what the archeologists have found so far.] Additionally, the tribal shaman (priests)
started to create documents so that their religious beliefs, traditions,
knowledge, and tenets would not be lost by their successors. [Sidebar: these
were the scientists of their age.]
Consequently, religious documents, together with trade documents are
among the earliest writing found.
Understand, writing came into existence at about the same
time as many large construction projects, like pyramids and ziggurats. And this was when city states, the
forerunners of the modern state formed.
For the next 4400+ years writing continued to be the main
medium for data, information, and knowledge documentation and
communications. During this time many
kingdoms and empires rose and fell, including The Roman Empire, and a vast
quantity of data, information, and knowledge was created documented and
lost. [Sidebar:
The worst was the destruction of the Library and Museum (University) at
Alexandria.]
Finally, with the beginnings of the European Renaissance in
the 1100s AD schools in Italy and Spain, initially created to teach monks to
read and write, began to collect and copy works from early times (including
Greek and Roman). The copies were
exchanged and libraries began to appear within these schools that were called
and were Universities. [Sidebar: This age is called the “Renaissance” because it
was the time when initially data, information, and knowledge were recovered and
new knowledge was documented.]
During this same period, and in part using the recovered
knowledge-base, came the slow innovation of new instruments including the
mechanical clock, and new navigational instruments, and new methods for ship
construction; all leading to an economic sea change in the European kingdoms. Further, during this time, apprentice schools
(schools of learn-by-doing) appeared in greater number with more formality to
their coursework. These schools taught
“manual trades”, the start of formal engineering and technology programs.
The Age of Printing (1455 AD)
All during this time, more and more clerics, (clerks) were
coping more documents. And though the
costs were high, there was a major demand for more copies of books, like the
Christian bible.
In about 1440, a German, Johannes Gutenberg, developed a
system that could make hundreds of copies.
In 1455, he printed what is known as the Gutenberg Bible and created the
technology infrastructure for a paradigm shift.
He also printed a goodly number of these bibles.
Another German, Martin Luther, subsequently kick started
this shift by nailing his 95 theses to the door in 1517. Prior to Luther most Europeans could not
read. The Roman Catholic clergy up to
and including the Pope took advantage of this to create highly imaginative
church doctrine that would provide them with a large money stream. Since they had been infected with the edifice
complex they used this money stream to indulge their favorite activity at Rome
and elsewhere.
Luther was intensely
unhappy with this church doctrine in his theses. Instead of the Pope being the final Authority
on Christianity, he preached that the Christian Bible was the final authority
and that all Christians had the right to read it. So, by the late 1500s, there were many
printed books in an increasing number of libraries with an increasing number of
Europeans (and shortly, American colonists) that could read. [Sidebar:
Remember that Harvard College, now Harvard University was founded in 1636.] And this was only step one of the Age of
Printing.
Step two in the Age of Printing was Rev. John Wesley’s
creation of “Sunday School”. Many or
most of the members Wesley’s sect, “The Methodists”, had been tenant farmers,
laborers, or cottage industry owners who had lost their jobs or their
businesses in the early stages of the industrial revolution (The late 1600s and
through 1700s).
At this time, machines
began to be used on farms and in factories, putting these people out of work. Wesley and the Methodists, by teaching them
to read and write on Sunday, their day off from work, enabled them to move into
and participate in the profits of the industrial revolution. Together with other movements toward
“schooling”, the age of printing and economic progress happened, creating the
“middle class.” [Sidebar: In Colonial New England,
early on—in the 1640s—primary schooling became a requirement. For more information, see my book.] Glossing over the many upgrades and
refinements, knowledge creation and communications was base on printing
technology until the 1980s, more or less.
During the Age of Writing, but particularly during the Age
of Printing, the methods for the communications data, information, and
knowledge began to diverge from trade.
In fact, in the US Constitution the founding fathers treated the “the US
mail” as a direct government function because they felt that communications for
everyone was so important. On the other
hand, they indicated that the government should “regulate” commerce among the
states; and there is a great difference between a function of government and
regulation by government.
The Age of Computing (~1940 AD)
There are two roots of the Age of Computing. These had to do with improving print-based
data storage and the communication of data and printed materials. The first root was data and information
communications. While there were many
early attempts of high-speed communications over long distances in Europe over
the ages, the first commercially success telegraph was developed by Samuel
Morse in 1837 [Sidebar: together with a standard
code, coincidently call the Morse Code.] By the 1850s this telegraphic system had
spread to several continents.
By 1874, Émile
Baudot invented the teletype machine which allowed any typist to type a message
on a typewriter keyboard, which the machine would then translate into Morse
code. A second teletype machine would
then print the message out at the other end.
This meant that typists, rather than trained telegraphers could send and
receive messages. Additionally, the
messages could be coded and sent much faster.
Three other inventions/innovations the facsimile machine, the telephone,
[Sidebar: a throwback to the Age of Speech], and the modem complete the initial intro the Age
of Computing.
The second root was the evolution of the computer
itself. Early in the industrial
revolution, Adam Smith discussed the assembly line process and the fact that
tooling can be made to improve the quality and quantity of output in every
activity in the process. Using this
process more or less, the hand tooling of the late 1700s gave was to increasing
complex powered mechanical tooling for manufacturing products in the 1800 and
1900s.
While that helped the
manufacturing component of the business, it did not help the “business”
component of the business. While the
need for improving the information handling component (reducing the time and
cost) of a business was recognized in the 1500s, it wasn’t until 1851 that a
commercially viable adding machine became available to help with the “book
keeping/accounting” of a business. These
machines produced a paper tape (printing) on which the inputs and output was
reported.
From 1851 to at least 1955 these mechanical wonders were
improved, to the point that in the early 1950s, they were call “analog
computers”. And for a short time there
was discussion about whether analog or this new thing called digital computers
were better. [Sidebar: Into the 1990s tidal predictions
were made by NOAA using analog equipment, since they kept proving to be more
accurate.]
The bases for the electronic, digital computer came from
several sources, mostly in the United States and in Britain, during the late
1930s and early to mid-1940s. However, it wasn’t until the invention of the
transistor in 1948 coupled with the concept of the Turing Machine (Alan Turing,
working from 1941 to 1950) that the first prototype commercial “electronic
computers” were developed.
In 1956 I “played” with my first computer. It consisted of a
Hollerith card reader for data input, electronics, a breadboard (a board with a
bunch of holes arranged in a matrix) on which a program could be “coded” by
connecting the holes with wires (soft wiring), and a 160 character wide printer
for the output. The part I played with
was the card sorter. Rather than sorting
the data in the “computer”, it was done by arranging and ordering the Hollerith
cards before inserting them into the card reader. The card sorter enabled the computer’s
operator to sort them very much faster than attempting to sort them by hand.
By 1964, computers had internal memory, about 40K bits, and
storage, tape drives (from the recording industry) and disks (giant
multi-platter removable disks) holding up to 2MB of data. [Sidebar: I
learned to code on two of these; IBM’s 1401 and 1620. I coded in machine
language, symbolic programming system and Fortran 1 and 2.] These computers had rudimentary operating
systems (OS) with input and output being a card reader and a punch card writer. And they had teletype machines attached as
control keyboards.
Fast forward to 1975; by this time, Technology had advanced
to the point where teletypewriters were attached as input/output terminals. These were running at 80 to 120 baud
(charters per minute, fast for a human typing, but very slow for a computer). Some old style television-like (cathode ray
tube, or CRT) terminals were becoming commercially available. Mostly, this were simply glass versions of teletype
printers, allowing the use to type into or read from an 80 characters-wide by
24 lines long green screen; and it was at about the same speed as a 120 baud
teletype. But, Moore’s Law was in high
gear with respect to hardware so that with each two years, computers doubled in
speed and capacity.
In about 1980 networking started to develop commercially,
though there were several services over telephone networks earlier. [Sidebar: The earliest global data network that I know of
was NASA’s network for data communications with the Mercury spacecraft in
1961.] Initially, this
development was in terms of a Local Area Network (LAN), linked through the use
of telephone cables. [Sidebar: During this time, I
set up some LANs at Penn State University and at Haworth, a furniture
manufacturing company.]
By 1985 the Internet protocols evolved. [Sidebar: Between
approximately 1985 and 1993, a significant group of engineers created a set of
protocols to international standards; they were called Open Systems Interconnect
or OSI protocols. They were a set of
protocols based on a seven layered model.
This group formed one camp; the other was from an amorphous organically
evolving TCP/IP group of protocols. This
group included academics, hackers, and software and hardware suppliers. This group preferred TCP/IP because it was a
free open source technology with few if any real standards—One HP Vice
President said of TCP/IP that it was so wonderful because there were so many
“standards” to choose from—and because OSI required significantly more
computing power because of architectural complexity of its security and other
functionality. Consequently, TCP/IP won,
but we are now facing all of the security and functionality issues that would
have been resolved by OSI.] [Sidebar: In
1987, I predicted that the internet would serve as the nervous system of all
organizations and was again looked at like I had two heads.] And technology had evolved to the point the
PCs on LANs were replacing CRTs as terminals to mainframe computers. Additionally, e-mail, word processing, and
spreadsheet software were coming into their own, replacing typewriters and mail
carried memo and documents.
In the early 1990s fiber optic cables from the Corning Glass
Works revolutionized data and information transfer in that it was speeded up
from minutes to micro-seconds with approximately the same cost. [Sidebar: Since I worked with data networks from 1980 on,
and since I led an advanced networking lab for a major defense contractor, I
could go into the hoary details for many additional posts, but I will leave it
at that.] As fiber optics
replaced copper wires, the speed of transmission went up and the cost went
down. There were two consequences. First, the number of people connected to the
internet drastically increased. Second,
more people became computer literate, at least to the point of using automated
devices—especially, the children.
By 1995, the Internet was linking home and work PCs with the
start of web (~1993), and by the 1996/1997 timeframe the combination of home
computers, e-mail, word processing, and the Internet/web was beginning to
disrupt retail commerce and the print information system. At this point the computer started to affect
all of data, information, and knowledge systems, which is disrupting culture
worldwide.
User Interfaces and Networking
As I discussed in a previous post and in SOA and User Interface Services: The
Challenge of Building a User Interface in Services, The Northrop
Grumman Technology Research Journal, ( Vol. 15, #1, August 2007), pp.
43-60, there three sets of characteristics of every user interface. The first is the type of user interface, the
second is how rich the interface is, and third, how smart the interface is.
There are three types of user interfaces, informational,
interaction oriented, and authoring. The
first is typical of the “Apps” on your smart phone, getting information. The second is transaction oriented. This means interacting with a computer in a
repeated manner, like when an operator is adding new records to a database. The third is authoring. This doesn’t mean writing only, it means
creating anything from a document, a presentation, to a movie, to a song, to an
engineering drawing, or to a new “App”lication.
This differentiation of the user interface only really developed in the
late 1990s and early 2000s as each of these types requires a different form
factor for the interface and increasingly complex software supporting it.
A rich user interface is an interface that performs
many functions internally, i.e. does a lot for you. As computer chips have become smaller, using
less power, and much faster, the interface has become much richer. This started with the first graphics
terminals (in which there were 24 by 80 address locations) in the early
1970s. Shortly, real graphics terminals
appeared costing upwards of $100K. These
graphics terminals required considerable computing power from the computers they
were directly connected with to operate.
In an effort to relieve the host computer of having to support
the entire set user interface functions Intel and others developed chips for
performing those functions. When some
computer geeks looked at the functionality of these chips, (the Intel 8008
chip, among them) they decided they could construct small computers from them;
the genesis of the PC [Sidebar: I was one of
these. With two friends, a home grown
electrical engineer and an account, I tried to convince a bank to loan us $5000
to start a “home computer” company and failed; most likely because of my lack
of marketing acumen].
A smart user interface is one that that takes the
information of a rich interface and intercommunicates with mainframe applications
(“the cloud” as marketers like pretend is a new concept) and their databases to
bi-directionally update (share) their data.
Rich interfaces have rapidly evolved as network technology has grown
from copper wire in the 1950s to fiber optics, Wi-Fi, and satellite communications
as competing interconnection technologies at the physical through network
layers of the OSI model. These enabled
first the Blackberry devices and phones, then in 2003, the Iphone and competing
products. The term “App” from application
is a rich and generally “smart” user interface.
[Sidebar: I put “smart” in quotes because
many of these “rich/smart apps” require constant updating burning data minutes
like they are free. When you allow them
to only use Wi-Fi they complain bitterly.]
The library
Initially, in the late 1970s, information technology started
to disrupt the printed information center, that is, the library. The library is the repository of printed
documents (encompassing data, information, and knowledge) of the Age of Print. It uses a card catalog together with an
indexing system, like the Dewy Decimal or Library of Congress systems, creating
metadata to organize the documents to enable a library’s user to find documents
containing data or information contained in the document pertaining to the
user’s search requirements.
It started from the use of the rudimentary data bases’ (records
management systems’) ability to control inventory, in the case of a library the
inventory of books. Initially,
automation managed the metadata about the library’s microfilm and/or microfiche
collections. [Sidebar: The libraries
used microfilm and microfiche technologies to reduce the volume and floor space
of its collections as well as enabling easier searches of those collections. Microfilm and microfiche technologies greatly
reduced the size of the material. For
example, an 18 by 24 inch newspaper could be reduced to less than a two inch
square (or rectangle). However, with so
many articles in each daily paper, library patrons had difficulty finding
articles on particular topics; enter automation.
Initially, the librarians used the one or two terminals
connected to the computer to either enter the metadata about what was on the
microfilm or fiche or pull that data for a library’s customer. They would enter the data using a Key Word In
Context (KWIC) indexing system.
Gradually,
as computing systems evolved the quantity and quality of metadata of what was
in the libraries increased and access within the library’s computing system
increased; generally with a terminal or two sitting next to the card
catalog. However, none of the metadata
was available outside the library.
With the advent of the World Wide Web standards and software
(both servers and browsers) all of that changed. [Sidebar:
Interestingly, at least to me, the two basic protocols of the web, HTML and XML
were derivatives of SGML, Standard Generalized Markup Language. SGML is a standard developed by the printing
industry to allow it to transmit electronic texts to any location and allow
printers at that location to print the document. It’s ironic that derivatives of that standard
are putting the printing industry out of business. One of the creators of SGML
worked for/with me for awhile.]
With the advent of the Internet, browser and
server software, and HTML (and somewhat later XML), the next step in the
disruption of libraries as repositories of data, information, and knowledge
started with search engines. The first
commercially successful search engine was Yahoo. It used (as do all search engines) web
crawler technology to discover metadata about websites then organizes it in a
large database. The most successful
search engine to date is Google; the key reason being that it was faster than
Yahoo and contained metadata about more websites. These search engines replaced card catalogs
of libraries before the libraries really understood what they were dealing
with. This has been especially true
since as a great deal of data and information has migrated to the web in
various forms and formats.
One of the things many library users went to the library
for, before the advent of the web, was to use encyclopedias, dictionaries, and
other such materials. Now, Wikipedia and
others sites of this type are the encyclopedias, dictionaries, thesaurus, and
so on, of the Age of Computing. Additionally, many people read newspapers and
magazines at the library. These too, are
now available on any rich, smart user interface. [Sidebar: For the
definitions see my paper on Services at the User Interface Layer for SOA. There is a link on this blog.] The net result is that libraries, as
physical facilities, are nearly obsolete.
Now “Big Data” (actually the marketing term for knowledge management of
the 1990s) libraries and pattern analysis algorithms are taking data,
information, and knowledge development of the library to the next level, as I
will discuss shortly.
Imaging: Photos, Videos, Television, Movies, and Pictures
One of the greatest transformations, so far, from the Age of
Print to the Age of Computing is in the realm imaging. Images, pictures if you will, have been found
on cave walls inhabited in the early “stone age” and some written languages are
still based on ideographs. So imaging is
one of the oldest forms of communications.
Late in the Age of Writing, in the Italian Renaissance,
images became much more realistic with the “discovery” of perspective. Up to that point images (paintings) had been
very “two dimensional”; now they were three.
Early in the Age of Print, actually starting with Guttenberg, wood cut images
were included in printed materials. From
1800 onward, a series of inventors created photography, capturing images on
a photo-reactive film. Lithography
allowed these images to be converted into printed images. Next moving images, the movies came into being;
as well as color photography.
From the 1960s, the U.S. Defense Department started looking
for methods and techniques to gather near real-time intelligence by flying over
the area—in this case areas in the USSR; and the USSR objected. The first attempt was through the use of
aerial photography, which started with a long winged version of B-57, then the
U2, and finally the SR-71. All of these
used the then state-of-the-art film-based photography. But all had pilots and only the SR-71 was
fast enough to evade anti-aircraft missiles.
So a second approach was used, sending up satellites and
then parachuting the film back to earth. There were two major problems with this
approach. First, was getting the
satellite up in a timely manner. Rockets
at the time took days to launch so getting timely useful data was
difficult. Second, having the film
canister land at the proper location for retrieval was difficult.
Therefore, the US government looked for another
solution. They, and their contractors,
came up with digital imaging. This
technology crept into civilian use over the next 20 years. Meanwhile, the
photographic industry, in the main, ignored it, in part, because of the
relatively poor quality of the images early on.
But this improved, both the resolution and the number of colors. Among others, this led to the demise of Kodak
and Fuji Films.
Another part of the reason the photo film industry ignored
digital imaging is the quantity of storage and the physical size of the storage
units required to store digital images. But as Moore’s Law indicated, the amount of
storage went up while the cost dropped drastically and this size of the
hardware needed decreased even more.
With the advent of SD and Micro-SD cards there was no need for
film. And with the advent of image standards
like .tif, .gif, and .jpg the digital images could be shared nearly instantly.
Retail Selling
From before the dawn of history, until 1893, trade (buying
and selling) was a face to face business.
In 1893, Sears, Roebuck, and Company started selling watches and then
additional products by catalog using the railroad to deliver the goods. When coupled with the Wells Fargo delivery
system—across the railroad system—allowed people in small towns to purchase
nearly any “ready-made” goods, from dresses to farm implements. This helped mass production industries and
helped to create cities of significant size.
It then followed (or led) the way by building retail outlets (stores) in
every town of even small size.
This model of retailing is still the predominate model, but is
the one being challenged by the Sears and Roebucks catalog model in an
electronic internet-based form of retailing.
Examples include the electronically based, Amazon, eBay, and Google. Amazon rebooted the no bricks and mortar
retailing catalog with an internet version.
It is successfully disrupting the retail industry. Likewise, eBay used the earliest market
model, trading in the local market, in a global version. Early on in the existence of the internet
various groups developed search engines.
Currently, Google is the primary search engine. But it is supporting a
concierge service which the Agility Forum, The Future Manufacturing Consortium
said would be a requirement for the next step in manufacturing and retailing,
that is, mass customization.
Additive Manufacturing
Early in my studies in economics, the professors tied
economic progress of the industrial age,
to mass production, to economies of scale. However, in the Age of Computing mass
production is giving way to mass customization.
Initially, in the 1970s, robotic arms were implemented on
mass production lines to reduce the costs of labor [Sidebar:
especially in the automotive industry.
At the time US automakers found it infeasible to fire inept or
unreliable employees do to union contracts.
Additionally, the labor costs, do to those contracts priced the US
automobiles out of competition with foreign automakers. To reduce their labor costs the automakers
tried to replace labor with robots numeric controlled machines. They had mixed success do to both technical
and political issues raised. This is not
unlike the conversion of the railroads for steam to diesel and the
“featherbedding that forced many railroad into contraction or bankruptcy.] By the 1990s automation and in particular
agile automation (automation that is leading to mass customization) is becoming
the business-cultural norm in manufacturing and fabrication industries. Automation is replacing employees in
increasingly complex activities. It will
continue to do so and will continue to enable increasing mass customization of
products.
For thousands of years components for everything from flint
arrowheads to automobile engine blocks to sculptures were created by
subtracting material from the raw material.
This subtracted material is waste.
A person created a flint arrowhead by removing shards from a flint
rock.
Automobile engine blocks are created by metal casing, then milling
the casting to smooth the surfaces for the moving engine components.
Stone and wood sculptures use the same material removal
procedures as creating an arrowhead.
These too create waste. Some cast
sculptures may not be milled or polished, but these are the exceptions and the
mold for the casting is still waste material.
Recently, a process similar to casting called injection
molding does create products with relatively little waste. But most component manufacturing processes
create considerable waste.
However, with the rise of ink jet printing technology,
people began to experiment with overlaying layers of material and found they
could create objects. This technology is called 3D printing or additive
manufacturing. It will have a much greater impact on manufacturing and mass
customization.
A simple example is car parts for older model vehicles. A car enthusiast orders a replacement part
for the carburetor in his 1960s vintage muscle car. The after-market parts company can create the
part using additive technology rather than warehousing hundreds of thousand
parts, just in case. The enthusiast gets
a part that is as good as, or perhaps better than, the original, the
after-market parts company doesn’t need to spend money on warehousing, and the
manufacturing process doesn’t product waste (or at least only a nominal
amount).
Research and development is using this technology is now
looking at creating bones to replace bones shattered in accidents, war, and so
on; in nano-versions to create a wide variety of products. [Sidebar: Actually,
one of the first “demonstrations” of the concept was on the TV show, Star trek,
where the crew went to a device that would synthesis any food or drink they
wanted.]
In the future this technology will disrupt all manufacturing
processes while creating whole new industries because it can create products
that meet the customer’s individual requirement better, while costing less, and
being produced in less time. For
example, imagine a future where this technology can create a new heart identical
to the heart that needs replacement, except fully functional—researchers are
looking into the technology that could, one day, do that.
Automotive
The automotive industry is already starting to feel the
effects of the Age of Computing. The
automotive industry has been based on cost efficiency since Henry Ford
introduced the assembly line. The
industry was among the first to embrace robots on the assembly line. But, there is much more.
The cell phone is becoming the driver’s interactive road
map. This road map tells the driver
which of several routes is the shortest with respect to driving duration based
on the current traffic and backups, as well as speed, and distance.
Since the 1970s automobiles have had engine sensors and “a
computer” to help with fuel efficiency and identifying engine
malfunctions. These have become
increasingly sophisticated.
Right now the automotive industry is driving toward
self-driving cars. There some on the
roads and many that have sensors (and “alerts”) that “assist” drivers in one or
more ways.
In the Near Future
And there are many industries like the automotive industry
which are feeling the effects of The Age of the Computer. That is, there are many more systems which
the technology and processes of the Age of Computing are disrupting.
While processes are in transformation today, it’s nothing
compared with what will happen in the immediate and not very distant future.
Education
Shortly, in the Age of Computing, information technology
will disrupt schools. People learn in
two ways, by doing (showing, or “hacking”) and by listening. And everyone learns using differing
combinations of these two methods.
Technology can and will be used to “teach” in all of these
combinations. Therefore, “the classroom”
is doomed.
Some students learn by doing, a method that “academics” pooh-pooh;
only “stupid” children take shop and apprenticeships don’t count, you must of a
“degree” to get ahead.
However, children do learn by doing, and enjoy it. Why do you think that so many boys, in
particular, choose to play video games?
Why is it, that pilots of the United States Navy have go
through 100 hours or more of computer simulations before trying a carrier
landing? Why, because they learn by
doing.
In the near future most of the jobs will require learn by
doing. Learn by doing includes simulations,
videos, solving problems, labs.
Automation has and increasingly will impact all of these, giving the
learn-by-doers the opportunity the current mass production education system
doesn’t.
The other method for learning is “learn by listening”. Learn by listening includes reading and audio
(audio includes both lectures and recordings of lectures). Over the past two hundred years, these have
been the preferred methods of “teaching” in mass production public schools.
In the main, it has worked “good enough” for a significant
percentage of the students, but numbers of students have fallen from the
system. Part of the problem is that some
teachers can hold the interest of some students better than other students,
other teachers may hold the interest an entirely different group of students,
and some may just drone on.
Now, using the technology of the age of computers, students
will be able to listen to lectures from teachers that they are best suited to
learn from. This means that the best
teachers are able to teach hundreds of thousands of students across the globe,
not just the 30 to 50 using the tools of the age of print.
It also means that students can learn in ways the more align
with their interests. [Sidebar: I saw a personal
example of this when I was working on my Ph.D. at the University of Iowa. The Chair of the Geography Department, Dr.
Clyde Kohn was also a wine connoisseur.
He decided to offer a course, called “the world of wines” to a group of
10 to 15 students. He would teach them
about climates and geomorphology (soils, etc.) that create the various
varieties of wine. He would also teach
them about wine making and distribution worldwide; so there was physical and
economic geography involved. In the
first 5 minutes of enrollment the class was filled and students were clamoring
to get into to it. He opened it up. By the time all students had enrolled there
were 450 students in the geography class and they probably learned more
geographic information than they ever had before. It also gave the state
legislator apoplexy.] As the
technology becomes more refined, students will be able to learn whatever they
need to learn without ever going near a classroom. I suspect that home (computer) schooling will
become the norm. Even “class discussion”
can be carried on using Skype/Gotomeeting/etc. like tools. Sports will be team-based rather than school-based.
I will define a prescriptive architecture for education in
another post. It turns the educational
system on its head. [Sidebar: Therefore, it will be ignored by the academic
elite.]
Medicine
Medicine, too, is starting and will continue to go a
complete disruption of the way it is performed (not practiced).
Currently, most of medical performance is in the rational
“weegee”-boarding stage and uses mass production methods, not mass
customization. But all people are
biological experiments and are, consequently, individuals. And every malfunction should be treated the
same way.
To get the best result for the individual, each type of drug
and dosage of that drug should be customized for the individual from the
start—not by trial and error.
In the near future, people will be diagnosed using their
complete history, analyzing their DNA, body scanning, and other diagnostic
measurements (both current and undiscovered). Then, using additive
nano-technology an exact prescription will be created. The medicine may be a single pill, mixed with
a liquid, through a shot, or some other method, introduced into the individual.
Much of this analysis will be done by a computer. Already, in the 1070s, a program simulated a
patient, so that medical students could attempt to diagnose the “patient’s”
problem. In order for this program to
serve its intended function, the MDs and Computer Assisted Instruction mavens
were continually refining the data used by the program. If this continued, and I suspect it did, the
database from this single program could have been used by an analysis program
to produce a diagnosis that would be comparable with that of expert diagnosticians.
This type of program could be, and likely will be, used by
every hospital in the country, saving time and a great deal of money in
identifying problems. The key reason
that it is not used today is that it has poor “bedside” manners—but so to do
many of the best diagnosticians.
Also, in many situations, this will take “The Doctor” out of
the loop.
For example, instead, the patient walks into “the office”,
which may be in front of the home computer.
The analysis “App” asks the patient questions and gets the patient’s
permission to access his or her medical record.
If the patient is at home and the “Analysis App” needs more information,
the app may ask the patient user to go to the nearest analysis point of service
(APOS) for further tests.
At the APOS the patient would lay on a diagnostic table, not
unlike those mocked up in Star Trek. This
table would have all sensors needed to take the necessary measures—in fact;
there will be a mobile version of this table in the back of a portable APOS
vehicle.
Once the analysis is complete, the APOS will use additive
manufacturing to incorporate all of the medicines needed in a form usable by
the patient.
For physical trauma or where this is irreparable damage to a
bone or organ, additive manufacturing will create the necessary bone or organ
and a robotic system will then transplant it into the patient’s body.
The heart of this revolution in medical technology is Integrated
Medical Information System based on the architecture I’ve presented in the post
entitled “An Architecture for Creating an Ultra-secure Network and Datastore.” Without such an ultra-secure system for the
medical records of each individual, externalities are too grave to consider.
However, even with an Integrated Medical Information System
there will be substantial side effects for all stakeholders, doctors, nurses,
technicians, and patients. There need no
longer be any medical professions, except for medical research
organizations.
Because the recurring costs of an APOS are low when compared
with the current doctor’s office/hospital facility, all people should be able
to pay for their own medical costs. So
there will be little or no need for insurance.
Additionally, because medicines are manufactured on a custom
basis as needed by the patient, there will be no need for pharmacies or systems
for the production and distribution of medicines.
With no medical professionals, no insurance, and no need for
the production and distribution of medicine, this whole concept will be fought,
in savage conflict, by the those groups, as well as Wall Street and federal,
state, and local welfare agencies, all of whom will lose their jobs. However, it will be inevitable, though
perhaps greatly slowed by governmental regulation.
Again, I will say a good deal more on this topic in a
separate post.
Further into the Future
There are three alternative future cultures possible in the
Age of Computers, the Singularity, Multiple Singularities, or the Symbiosis of
Humans and Machines. These may all sound
like science fiction or fantasy, but they are based on my 50+ years of watching
the Age of Computers and technology advance.
The Singularity
In a story that someone told me in the 1960s, a man created a
complex computer with consciousness. He
created it to answer one question, “Is there a god?” The computer answered, “Now there is.” A definition of “The Singularity” is that all
of the computers and computer controlled devices, like smart phones become “cells”
in a global artificial consciousness.
Many science fiction writers and futurists have speculated
on just such an occurrence and its implications. John von Neumann first uses the term
"singularity" in the early 1950s as applied to the acceleration of technological
change and the end result.
In 1970, futurist Alvin Toffler wrote Future Shock. In this book, Toffler defines the term "future
shock" as a psychological state of individuals and entire societies where
there is "too much change in too short a period of time".
The Singularity Is
Near: When Humans Transcend Biology is a 2006 non-fiction book about
artificial intelligence and the future of humanity by Ray Kurzweil
Many science fiction writers and many movies have speculated
about what happens when the Singularity arrives. For the most part these stories take the form
of Man/Machine Wars or conflicts. In the
first Star Trek movie, the crew of the Enterprise had to battle” a world
consuming machine consciousness. In the
Terminator series of movies it’s man versus machine and man and machine versus
a machine. And in The Matrix, it’s about
man attempting to liberate himself from being a slave of the machine
consciousness. [Sidebar: In the mid-1970s I had a
very interesting discussion with Dr. John Crossett about the concept that
formed the plot for The Matrix.]
There are literally hundreds of other books and short
stories about dealings and conflicts with the singularity. While this is all science fiction, science fiction
has often pointed the way to science and technology fact.
Multiple Singularities
A second scenario is that because of the advances in artificial
intelligence there are multiple singularities.
Again, Science Fiction has dealt with this scenario. Isaac Asimov was one that dealt with multiple
singularities and the results in his I Robot series of stories. In this scenario, more than one robot achieved
consciousness. In these scenarios,
humanity plays a subordinate role to the “artificial intelligence”. These singularities interact with each other
in both very human and very un-human ways.
Symbiosis of Humans and Machines
The best set of scenarios, from the perspective of humanity,
is the symbiotic scenarios. All
multi-cell life, above a very rudimentary level is composed of a symbiosis of
cells and bacteria. So it is reasonable
that there could be a symbiosis of humans and machines.
For example, nano-bots could be inserted that would deliver
toxins to cancerous cells to directly kill those cells, to inhibit their
transmission of the cancer causing agent to other cells or to link with brain with orders to repair any
damaged cells. These nano-bots would be excreted when their work is complete.
Taking this a step further, these nano-bots could allow the
human brain direct access to the information on the Internet or “in the cloud”
(as marketers like to say). [Sidebar: “Cloud
Computing” has been with us ever since the first computer terminals used a proprietary
network to link themselves to a mainframe computer. Yes, the technology has been updated, but it’s
still remote computing and storage.] This
would mean that all you would have to do is think to watch a movie, or gain
some knowledge about the world around you.
The very dark downside of this is that terrorists, politicians, news commentators,
or other gangsters and thugs could control your thinking, i.e., direct mind
control. And actually the artificial consciousness
could take over and use human to their benefit. [Sidebar: Remember a thief is nothing more
than a retail politician, retail socialist, or retail communist. Real politicians, socialists, and communists
steal at the wholesale level.] This mind control is the ultimate
greedy way to steal—anyone whose mind is controlled is by definition a slave of
the mind controller.
“Space the Final Frontier”
I see only one way out of the mind-control conundrum, traveling
into and through space. Once humans
leave the benign environment of the earth, the symbiosis of humans and machines
(computers and other automation) becomes imperative for both humans and their
automated brethren. Allies are not made
in peace, only when there are risks or threats.
Even the best astronomical physicists readily admit that
while we don’t understand our universe, as humans we may never be able to
understand the universe. There is simply
too much to fathom. However, with the
symbiosis with artificial consciousness, we may be able to take a stab at it.
